In the selections that we read out of The
Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith develops the idea of sympathy in which
human beings, as social persons, inherently maintain a form of natural sympathy
towards others. When a person in hurt or in need of compassion, people are able
to produce it, allowing for the gross accumulation of human emotion, ultimately
leading to a sense of mutual understanding and camaraderie. Although mankind is
consistently working towards personal success in the individual realm, the
social realm enables such affection. In Section 3, Chapter 2, Smith describes,
"It is because mankind are disposed
to sympathize more entirely with our joy than with our sorrow, that we make
parade of our riches, and conceal our poverty" (62). By this I believe
he refers to the way in which people can begin to relate, sharing their own
experiences of success to present an image of themselves that exists in
happiness, instead of experiencing immediate vulnerability with the discussion
of sorrowful topics. He continues, "The
fortunate and the proud wonder at the insolence of human wretchedness that it
should dare to present itself before them, and with the loathsome aspect of its
misery presume to disturb the serenity of their happiness. The man of rank and
distinction, on the contrary, is observed by all the world. Everybody is eager
to look at him, and to conceive, at least by sympathy, that joy and exultation
with which his circumstances naturally inspire him. His actions are the objects
of the public care" (64). From this passage, I began to wonder about
the people/actions that we watch in the news and in popular culture, versus
what we chose to hide. Some people do not watch certain news stations because
all they discuss are "bad" things; while it is often true that news
stations spin stories in ways that are ultra-dramatic and out of touch, is it
possible that on a deeper level, it is the topic is what turns people away due
to their discomfort? Is that the reason that people pay attention to the media
that promotes the lifestyles of the wealthy, even if they are ridiculous? How
does this passage relate to the focus of governmental issues such as where the
tax revenue goes, or the needs of those on welfare?
No comments:
Post a Comment